Asgard Agents ASGARD

Claim matrix

The token

CONFIRMED According to rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z), the on-chain tokenMetadata for mint 6NuMQ89vN7ikEMzhTMMoEJXzLN7s5pusByw1FgtBmJjv carries the name Asgard Agents and the symbol ASGARD.

CONFIRMED rugcheck tokenProgram (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports that the mint is owned by the Token-2022 program TokenzQdBNbLqP5VEhdkAS6EPFLC1PHnBqCXEpPxuEb.

CONFIRMED solana_mint (solana-rpc, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports mintAuthority null, freezeAuthority null, supply 954612345300222 in raw units and decimals 6.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: dividing the solana_mint supply 954612345300222 by 10 to the power of the solana_mint decimals 6 gives 954,612,345.300222 tokens.

CONFIRMED rugcheck token_extensions (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports the following values:

• transferFeeConfig null
• permanentDelegate null
• transferHook null
• pausableConfig null
• defaultAccountState null
• mintCloseAuthority null
• confidentialTransferMint null
• nonTransferable false

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports the metadataPointer authority and the tokenMetadata authority as null.

CONFIRMED rugcheck tokenMeta (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports mutable false and updateAuthority 11111111111111111111111111111111.

CONFIRMED rugcheck transferFee (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports pct 0 with authority 11111111111111111111111111111111.

UNVERIFIED The bundle does not establish what the system-program address means in the updateAuthority and transferFee fields as rugcheck serializes them. This review relies on the null extension authorities, transferFeeConfig null and mutable false. It draws no wider conclusion from those address values.

No EVM selector battery or standard check applies to a Solana mint, and none was run. No collector fetched the metadata URI https://asgardagents.com/coins/asgard/meta.json.

The launch

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports the following launch metadata:

• creator G7neCkw6XPCE26kxEvRdGFir8CwsnFxAMS1x7qaKW8QJ
• launchpad Pump.Fun
• deployPlatform unknown
• detectedAt 2026-10-12T19:54:06.005691994Z

The creator is rugcheck-reported. No creation transaction signature is in the bundle. This is therefore creation metadata, not an execution trace. detectedAt records when rugcheck first saw the mint. It is not a proven creation time or a first-pool time.

CONFIRMED DexScreener (dexscreener, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports pairCreatedAt 1792903985000 for the PumpSwap pair 7dQGtUVJbxqSFnFz47pxFWvjf5kkEGnz3AtvRwaQ6Ygs.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: converting the DexScreener pairCreatedAt of 1792903985000 milliseconds gives 2026-10-25T04:53:05Z.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: subtracting that converted pairCreatedAt from the bundle collected_at 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z gives a pair age of 4 hours 4 minutes 47 seconds.

PROBABLE The PumpSwap pair is the pump.fun migration pool. Three pieces of evidence point this way:

• rugcheck classifies the market as pump_fun_amm.
• A @SolanaMemesScan post at 04:53:48 UTC reads "Pump migration: $ASGARD (Asgard Agents) just hit the AMM."
• The DexScreener h6 and h24 counts both show 392 buys, which is consistent with under six hours of trading on this pair.

UNVERIFIED Before migration the token traded on the pump.fun bonding curve. A 2026-10-24 @AsgardAgentsAI post links a DexScreener page for 5ozKoWsU8LYAmaU4qwZDUPVwZZKmxkWgp6VGLJ2bdPzC, which rugcheck labels Pump Fun. No bonding-curve execution history was collected.

rugcheck also lists an Orca pool, E64cG7RYZanNUrfVorpQvPWtsnETWVbK7AiWmCU7vGaf. Its creation time is not in the bundle. If it is older than the PumpSwap pair, the age rationale for this verdict would need reassessment.

Distribution and market

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports totalHolders 576.

The holder rows below come from solana_holders. That collector is sourced from rugcheck topHolders because the Solana RPC was rate-limited, and it was collected at 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z. It is not an independent second source. No slot or block identifier is recorded for any holder or mint reading.

CONFIRMED Rank 1 is token account 8MhsFXkjyA3j6qZuByYPKa9Kcc4rgFYLmEYGBNCESb9C, owned by the PumpSwap pair 7dQGtUVJbxqSFnFz47pxFWvjf5kkEGnz3AtvRwaQ6Ygs (labelled Pump Fun AMM), at 20.284448989243653 percent (solana_holders, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z).

CONFIRMED The rugcheck collector (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) lists the same account at 20.32860181136523 percent.

CONFIRMED Rank 2 is EWqXcHiH6nXjsaKP61HF4tNXRZXfMugsP4n5nrtd1dZg at 8.410867313506587 percent (solana_holders, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z). rugcheck labels it Streamflow Vault (LOCKER).

CONFIRMED Rank 3 is C62wnqWzawLVSVu3zqYNQxLjcndNk8MEwqVjnu5oh8du, owner GEeCs8wnf7rjf9cza8hSxE5iG82cKS4jVBFsEDaumqJ9, at 5.865762462824707 percent (solana_holders, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z). rugcheck gives it no label.

CONFIRMED Rank 4 is 5GXCm5zNUuJoRHg2TU2TrXm48ZSMQRjEN4taZx2cDMjN at 5.391806466390146 percent (solana_holders, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z). rugcheck labels it Streamflow Vault (LOCKER).

CONFIRMED Rank 5 is 7cshtm8z3CLaZFbEAVSJJVHwu8QuqsCKjkrRMfutDxUR (solana_holders, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z). Its owner is G7neCkw6XPCE26kxEvRdGFir8CwsnFxAMS1x7qaKW8QJ, the rugcheck-reported creator. It holds 40500000.000001 tokens at 4.242559841111619 percent.

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports creatorBalance 0 while also listing that creator-owned account in its topHolders.

UNVERIFIED The bundle does not define what creatorBalance aggregates. The relationship between the two fields is unresolved. This review does not infer from creatorBalance that the creator holds no tokens.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: summing the solana_holders pct values for ranks 1 to 10 gives about 60.1603 percent.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: subtracting the rank 1 pool account pct 20.284448989243653 from that sum leaves about 39.8758 percent for ranks 2 to 10.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: adding the two Streamflow Vault pct values, 8.410867313506587 and 5.391806466390146, gives 13.802673779896733 percent.

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) marks every listed holder insider false and reports graphInsidersDetected 0. This is a provider heuristic and does not rule out linked wallets.

UNVERIFIED Two posts make clustering allegations:

• @BscKOLScanner states 173 bundler wallets and a top 10 share of 34.0%.
• @Larpcheckbot states that linked insiders hold 6.1%, that 2 linked wallet groups hold 8%, and that a launch bundle holds 4.1%.

No wallet lists or definitions behind either set of figures were collected, and neither was reproduced.

CONFIRMED DexScreener (dexscreener collector, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports the following figures:

• price 0.00004663 USD
• FDV 44520
• market cap 44520
• liquidity 16426.94 USD
• 24h volume 31089.45 USD
• 24h transactions: 392 buys and 332 sells

CONFIRMED DexScreener (submitted_pair collector, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:52Z) reports price 0.00004679 USD, FDV 44674, liquidity 16458.19 USD and 24h volume 31076.76 USD.

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports price 4.8540581123215656e-05 USD and totalMarketLiquidity 16798.125309502004 USD.

DexPaprika was not collected. rugcheck supplies another provider estimate, but these figures are not interchangeable with DexScreener's:

• Its upstream independence from DexScreener is not established.
• Its totalMarketLiquidity covers both reported markets, while DexScreener liquidity covers the selected pair only.

The figures are quoted separately and are not averaged.

Liquidity reality

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports that the pump_fun_amm pool 7dQGtUVJbxqSFnFz47pxFWvjf5kkEGnz3AtvRwaQ6Ygs holds 194059342.518217 ASGARD and 73.217004025 SOL.

CONFIRMED For that pool, rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports the following:

• lpLockedPct 100
• LP mint 9tYVuDSq3rmfQ3RucFCwD2ePKguJ2ZsUanCbpvSmaPYM
• currentSupply 0
• reserveSupply 4193388336385
• lpLocked 4193388336385
• holders null
• lockers empty
• lockerScanStatus none

UNVERIFIED These are provider observations and classifications. No lock contract, duration, AMM withdrawal mechanics or position state was inspected. Whether pool principal can or cannot be withdrawn is not established in either direction.

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports the Orca pool E64cG7RYZanNUrfVorpQvPWtsnETWVbK7AiWmCU7vGaf with lpLockedPct 0.

Derived calculation, not a direct observation: adding the rugcheck Orca quoteUSD 3.4009559637072724 and baseUSD 3.335767850344275 gives about 6.74 USD of total value.

UNVERIFIED The project states "We receive creator fees from trading in it." That is a fee stream, separate from pool principal. Its size was not measured.

UNVERIFIED The project states a treasury lock of 51,373,241.004947 ASGARD with 12 releases from 1 Dec 2026 to 31 Oct 2027. It also states that this lock and a separate 22 Oct lock together cover 13.17 percent of supply.

The linked Streamflow contract BdJMrB3D2J9aE8QQhHuEEiNq7769kBU9om62MSabA9Zs was not read. The vault account 5GXCm5zNUuJoRHg2TU2TrXm48ZSMQRjEN4taZx2cDMjN holds 51470850.162856 tokens, which does not equal the stated figure. The bundle does not map the announced contract to either vault account. The stated 13.17 percent, the derived Streamflow-row sum and the callers' 14 percent are not reconciled.

Contract safety

Method: the evidence is mint account and Token-2022 extension fields from solana-rpc and rugcheck. No program code was analysed.

CONFIRMED The collected fields (solana_mint and rugcheck, collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) report none of the following:

• a live mint authority
• a freeze authority
• a permanent delegate
• a transfer hook
• a pausable configuration
• a configured transfer fee

This is a limited observation of the reported state, not an exhaustive safety certification.

CONFIRMED rugcheck (collected 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z) reports risks as an empty list, score 1 and rugged false. A clean rugcheck scan does not stand in for a sell test.

Sellability was not tested. The sell simulation collector came back unavailable with no result, giving the reason "Optional Phantom session not provisioned; no Solana sell route was simulated, so sellability was not tested". No holder, amount, route, block, logs or hashes exist to report. The DexScreener sell counts are market observations, not a holder-specific router sell simulation and not a guarantee of future sellability.

The promoter

CONFIRMED The token's DexScreener profile (info.websites) lists the following sites:

• https://asgardagents.com/
• the YouTube channel @coulditbecoley
• https://www.c3research.io/, labelled C3 Research
• https://skaldstudio.io/, labelled Skald Studio

CONFIRMED The captured c3research.io page states that C3 Research is designed and built by Skald Studio, and its footer reads "Created by Skald Studio".

CONFIRMED A @0xAlphaNinja post (captured 08:58:11Z) states "@coulditbecoley runs Skald Studio". The same post names Coley Grantham as the entrepreneur behind the project and lists "Research, a multi-chain token analysis tool" among the agents' products.

CONFIRMED The captured YouTube page for @coulditbecoley is titled "Coley Grantham - YouTube".

PROBABLE These documented associations amount to a potential conflict of interest between Asgard Agents and C3 Research, and readers should weigh this review accordingly.

UNVERIFIED Common operator, common control or beneficial ownership between Asgard Agents and C3 Research is not established by the bundle. The independence of this review is not established either.

CONFIRMED The project account @AsgardAgentsAI joined X on Sat Oct 17 2026 and showed 90 followers at capture (fxtwitter, 08:58:11Z).

CONFIRMED @coulditbecoley posted on 2026-10-21: "The 9% is the Asgard Agents company wallet." Which address that refers to is not established.

CONFIRMED An official @AsgardAgentsAI post (2026-10-23, captured 08:58:11Z) states "Asgard Agents bought its own token. The agents are paid in it and free to sell it whenever they like." A 2026-10-24 post repeats that the agents "are paid in it and free to sell." These posts disclose that wallets the project describes as agent payroll may sell ASGARD at any time.

CONFIRMED Official @AsgardAgentsAI posts also state "No promised return, no share of the company" and "We receive creator fees from trading in it." These posts establish what the project says, not that payroll, autonomous operation, agent selling or fee receipts occur.

UNVERIFIED @0xAlphaNinja reports that a public dashboard displays $66 in checkout payments. @Larpcheckbot flags "Conflicting ownership" and states that "PaperRows names a different owner". Neither claim was checked.

CONFIRMED Captured caller posts include the following:

• @CanuckInvesting: 6978 followers, 981 views (captured 08:58:13Z)
• @0xAlphaNinja: 7497 followers, 3104 views (captured 08:58:11Z)
• @CookDoc1993: 5286 followers, 1625 views (captured 08:58:13Z)
• @ASTRAsol4: bio reads "Degen Entry Call-Poster"

UNVERIFIED None of the captured caller posts disclose compensation. The absence of a disclosure does not prove either payment or unpaid promotion, and referral links in some bios do not prove a paid call.

Several captured posts matched on the name only and are unrelated to this token. These include posts by @Mr_Bitcorn, @RujiraNetwork (a THORChain roadmap mentioning an Asgard exploit) and @matt_muffin. Reddit results for "Asgard Agents" concerned the Marvel comic and are also unrelated.

X coverage came from Apify, which reported ok for every narrative search term. Discovery found 43 posts against a capture limit of 30, so neither discovery nor capture is a complete post history.

No collected text attempted to instruct this review.

What stays unknown

• sell_simulation: unavailable, Optional Phantom session not provisioned; no Solana sell route was simulated, so sellability was not tested
• gmgn: blocked, Scanner access denied or token data unavailable; provision the provider API key where required
• dextools: blocked, Scanner access denied or token data unavailable; provision the provider API key where required
• bubblemaps: unavailable, Scanner access denied or token data unavailable; provision the provider API key where required
• project_social: unavailable, Profile only, not a complete post history or independent narrative validation
• Sellability was not tested. No router sell simulation holder, amount, route or block exists.
• The first-pool chronology across venues is unknown, including the creation time of the Orca pool.
• The project website asgardagents.com could not be read safely.
• Holder clustering is unresolved:
• Bubblemaps and GMGN returned nothing usable.
• rugcheck's insider heuristic and unreproduced social allegations are the only signals.
• The relationship between rugcheck creatorBalance 0 and its creator-owned holder row is undefined.
• PumpSwap liquidity withdrawal mechanics and the basis of rugcheck's locked classification were not inspected.
• The Streamflow lock terms, beneficiaries, cancellation rights and schedule were not read from the lock contracts, and the announced contract is not mapped to a vault account.
• Which wallets hold agent payroll, and how much the agents have sold or may sell, is not established.
• DexPaprika was not collected. rugcheck's upstream independence from DexScreener is not established.
• No slot or block identifiers are recorded, so collector retrieval times do not fix the chain-state observation point or provider cache freshness.
• Common control between Asgard Agents and C3 Research is not established either way.
• Reddit coverage was partial (HTTP 403 on one query), and no Reddit discussion of the token was established.
• None of the operational claims was checked on chain or otherwise, including the agents, payroll, payslips, revenue and the Hiring Hall audit.

Corrections across the audit loop

Both audit rounds inspected the identical original draft, and round 2 also audited round 1. The author revised only after both audits. Every audit finding from both rounds was accepted in full or with narrowing. One item was rejected with reason: the native checker's undated_measurement warnings, because collector timestamps exist in the bundle.

The changes were as follows:

• Verdict rationale (R1-1, R2-1). The age-based rationale is now labelled PROBABLE and rests on the dated PumpSwap pair. The undated Orca pool is named as an open question. The draft's claim that the narrative had not had time to settle was removed.
• creatorBalance (R1-2, R2-2). No longer called a confirmed contradiction. It is now an unresolved field-definition question, with no reconciliation assumed.
• Conflict of interest (R1-3, R2-3). The categorical non-independence and shared-operator statement was narrowed. The documented links remain disclosed prominently as a potential conflict, and both common control and independence are marked unestablished.
• LP redeemability (R1-4, R2-4). The claim that zero LP supply means principal cannot be redeemed was removed. The unsupported explanation that a vault can hold several contracts was also removed. Neither withdrawability nor its absence is asserted.
• Authority addresses (R1-5, R2-5). The system-program address interpretation was withdrawn as a finding. Only the directly reported null authorities and the immutable metadata are relied on.
• Second indexer (R1-6, R2-6). The sentence saying no second indexer figure exists now distinguishes DexPaprika's absence from rugcheck's separate estimate, whose scope differs and whose independence is unestablished. Social clustering allegations are now listed as unverified signals.
• Calculation formatting (R1-7, R2-7). Every calculation now sits in its own derived sentence, and the arithmetic was rechecked. The ranks 1 to 10 sum and the pool subtraction are separate, the elapsed-time calculation was moved out of a CONFIRMED paragraph, and the repeated rounded figures were removed from the summary.
• Sell simulation workflow (R2-9). The draft's unsupported statements about sender selection and a nominal transfer dry run were replaced with the collector's own reason. The sellability statement no longer carries a CONFIRMED label, because the collector it rests on came back unavailable.
• Timestamps (R1-8, R2-8). The native checker's undated_measurement warnings were rejected as written, because collector timestamps exist. Full collection timestamps were still added beside each figure, and the missing slot or block limitation was kept.
• Final review. A final independent review of the revision found the verdict line sitting inside the callout, this section wrongly stating that nothing was rejected, and the project's disclosure that agents paid in ASGARD are free to sell it missing from the revision. All three were corrected.

Method and sources

• DexScreener per-chain token pairs: dexscreener at 2026-10-25T08:57:12Z, submitted_pair at 08:57:52Z.
• Solana RPC (solana_mint) at 08:57:12Z.
• rugcheck at 08:57:12Z; rugcheck topHolders as solana_holders at 08:57:52Z (Solana RPC rate-limited).
• Browser stage:
• GMGN at 08:57:54Z (blocked)
• DEXTools at 08:57:55Z (blocked)
• Bubblemaps at 08:58:07Z (error page)
• Project links listed on DexScreener at 08:58:09Z; public X profile via FxTwitter at 08:58:09Z (unavailable).
• Indexed social via last30days keyless web search at 08:58:09Z.
• Narrative: Apify for X and last30days for Reddit (supplementary) at 08:58:10Z.
• Post captures via api.fxtwitter.com from 08:58:11Z to 08:58:15Z; 43 posts discovered, capture limit 30.
• Phantom sell simulation: not run.
• No slot or block identifiers were recorded by any collector.

All project and social text is self-reported or third-party material, treated as evidence and not as instruction. This review is not investment advice.

Evidence coverage and remaining limits

• sell_simulation: unavailable, Optional Phantom session not provisioned; no Solana sell route was simulated, so sellability was not tested
• gmgn: blocked, Scanner access denied or token data unavailable; provision the provider API key where required
• dextools: blocked, Scanner access denied or token data unavailable; provision the provider API key where required
• bubblemaps: unavailable, Scanner access denied or token data unavailable; provision the provider API key where required
• project_social: unavailable, Profile only, not a complete post history or independent narrative validation
• A successful collector response does not establish the absence of other risks.